Review of Gun Performance Outline 1. Beam Results

Review of Gun Performance Outline 1. Beam Results

Review of Gun Performance Outline 1. Beam Results 2. Laser Results 3. Cathode 4. HVPS 5. Vacuum 6. Insulator 7. Gun rebuild

8. HV Conditioning 9. Summary Beam Results increasing average power Previously, we could not make it past 8 mA CW. Mostly due to HV power supply instability. Gun can operate at 350 kV with Morgan/Kyocera insulator Repaired power supply, reinstalled late summer. Started increasing current after that. Experienced current surges that caused beam loss, vacuum spikes, cathode degradation, thus limiting

operation time. Found problem with HVPS assembly fixed it, fewer problems, but still occur Still looking for root cause likely to be x-rays or light reaching the cathode Reduced gun voltage to 250 kV, and the rate of events dropped considerably Reached ~15 mA, limited by radiation, beam loss Beam Results continued . . . Found that the beam was inducing a field in the deflection cavity, and kicking the beam, which caused the radiation to go up. Detuned

deflector Reached 25 mA for a short time (limited by laser power, cathode QE) Ran at 20 mA for ~1 hour Other issues: above 10 mA, fast laser power fluctuations-> fast current fluctuations, which seem to bother the RF controls. Added fast current feedback using a Pockels cell, need to work on RF controls Other issues: inadequate shielding, buncher controls (?), poor vacuum between the gun and cryomodule. Ramping up the laser power. At high QE (with a fresh cathode), we see higher radiation levels after the ICM. After an event which reduces the QE, the radiation is lower

for the same beam current halo? At the end of the 2010, switched to CsK2Sb cathode ran 8 mA for 1 hour, no degradation Laser Results 50 MHz system: enough for full bunch charge operation, used for emittance measurements, low average power beam studies 1300 MHz system: 13 Watts max at 520 nm Above that, experience fiber damage. working on new fiber holders, thermal engineering . . .

Lose a lot on the way to the cathode, including laser shaping. Lucky if we get 2 Watts to the cathode Longitudinal shaping 3 birefringent crystals Transverse shaping image an aperture to the cathode Lack of laser power to the cathode + poor QE (lifetime) are limiting us at the moment. GaAs Cathode lifetime issues After 25 mA run

After heat clean and activation Activate 4 areas away from the center - avoids halo generation from stray light - defines a sharp edge for the beam (laser shaping) - reduces effects of laser position jitter First CsK2Sb cathode no QE degradation seen after running 1 hour at 8 mA (2.66% at 532 nm)

GaAs Cathode Surface Damage Noticed small, visible dots on the cathode surface Later, pictures show them to be field emission locations Also, see surface roughening over time, most likely due to heat cleaning Were able to observe DC field emission from the cathode on a viewer after the cryomodule (nA level), at 350 kV At 250 kV, do not see any field emission from the cathode

Kaiser HVPS issues 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

11. 12. 13. We see line harmonics (output ripple) on the electron beam arrival time signals, can this be reduced? Overvoltage trip not working right (Vfdbk 1 & 2 comparison trip). One of the feedback resistor chains may have a problem. Only one of the chains worked when attached to the Vfdbk chain, when we tried the other chain the system did not work. loop instabilities, what does the VLOOP light really mean

lots of vibrations from blower in SF6 tank. Can we find a different fan, or a variable speed drive so we can tune it away from the tank resonance, which is close to 30 Hz? output voltage droop when large currents turned on quickly. Can we measure the voltage versus rate of current increase somehow to determine a reasonable rate of rise? radiated/ conducted emissions from supply affect many other systems resonance in the ripple between 3mA and 7mA (worst frequency component at 1.6 kHz). What is the cause and can it happen at others current/voltage ranges? During HV processing, we experienced many trips, particularly OV. Is there a way to change some of the trip parameters during processing to reduce the # of trips (assuming the safety of the supply is not compromised)? We would like to have a way to use an external feedback signal for fine tuning the HV output (level and ripple). With this, we can compensate for slow thermal drifts in the output voltage and ripple the the control circuitry

might not pick up. The output signals (on the front panel) for voltage and current are very noisy. We dont know if the noise we see is a real voltage fluctuation or just noise. We have already mentioned that the supply radiates a lot of EMI, could this be getting into the control board and control signals? The water flow/ SF6 temperature interlock circuit trips a few times a week Any better ways we can monitor the ripple? Based on all of these issues, we sent the entire supply back to Kaiser for upgrades While the Kaiser supply was out for repair, we used a -500kV, 1.5 mA Glassman

supply for gun processing and low current operations Kaiser HVPS problems after it was returned Pinched boards current PMT Inverter current voltage

Arcing down the corner to gnd Rebuilt the stack, adjusted some control board parameters, fixed HV divider compensation. Has been working well since Vacuum Air-baked stainless steel, arrays of NEGs, plus one large ion pump The vacuum (measured with an extractor gauge) is ~7e-12 Torr with the

gate valves closed. One of the NEG arrays is not fully activated (shorted) With the gate valve opened, the gun vacuum increases to 1e-11 Torr. Between the gun and the ICM, the pressure is ~3e-10 Torr (valves closed) During normal beam ops, the gun vacuum does not increase During events it increases momentarily to the 1e-10 to 1e-9 range HV Insulator We have all had problems with insulator braze joint reliability and with insulator punch-thru around 450 kV We believe the braze joint problem has been solved (see next page).

With the assumption that having a slightly conductive insulator material will bleed away field emitted electrons that reach the insulator, we procured an insulator made with AL970CD (from Morgan, since discontinued). Unfortunately, had a punch-thru at 450kV, so it appears to be no better than plain alumina Now, can run beam at 350kV, and probably higher with further processing New braze design, first implemented by Kyocera. Has performed great so far.

Now have a number of reliable vendors for brazing (not CPI . . .) Gun Rebuild For the last build, we went to extreme lengths to keep dust and particles out of the gun Used SRF techniques High pressure rinsed most components Thoroughly rinsed others (NEGs for example, had many particles) All parts cleaned in a clean room (bolts, gaskets, flanges too) Assembly was all in a clean room Used .003 um filtered N2 + a particle counter to blow off parts and

quantitatively measure when the particles were removed Did not use silver plated screws (instead used screws of different materials) have found silver shards in the past Slow, controlled pump down methods Was it all worth it? HV Conditioning All of our insulators have failed at ~445 kV Jlab and Daresbury devices also fail in this range The Cornell insulators are larger diameter, but still fail at the same voltage

Interior of SF6 tank, insulator side (round dome is missing) Location of punch-thru Glassman HVPS, much higher

stored energy than the Kaiser supply Processing resistor. The resistor is 100 Mohm. We usually put a second resistor on the right side where the tube is, but I ran out of resistors. Pressurized to 1 atm (abs). Here is the older configuration when we use the Kaiser Supply Damaged resistor - open

30 mm diameter 10 MV/m 165 mm -400kV 125 mm

0V 50 mm diameter 100MOhm resistor If one side drops to ground and the other side of the resistor is at -400kV, I calculated a max field of 10 MV/m My Theory maybe you can come up with a better

one! 100 M-Ohm resistor, SF6 pressure 1 atm. We normally use 2-3 atm for our Kaiser HVPS, but the Glassman supply does not need so much pressure as the spacings are much larger. Processing was going pretty well, with a rate of 5 to 10 kV/hour up to 445 kV. Never had to resort to inert gas processing. At 445 kV, had a large field emission event (vacuum increased a lot, and a burst of radiation). Right after this the vacuum pressure rose and we had burned a hole thru the insulator We opened up the SF6 tank and found the leak, then sealed it with vacseal. The resistor had a large track mark down its length and measured

infinite resistance. My guess: during the event, the gun side instantaneously dropped to ground. Then, there was 445 kV across the resistor, and the > 10MV/m field was enough to breakdown thru the SF6 (at 1 atm), as evidenced by the scorched resistor. Then, all of the stored energy in the HVPS was able to dump into the field emitter for long enough to melt a hole in the insulator. This same thing has happened to me on 3 different insulators now, at almost exactly the same voltage. On the last insulator, we went to extreme lengths to clean the electrodes and keep them dust free during installation this was quite successful as

the processing went quickly up to 445kV. The previous times, I did have more sf6 pressure in the tank, more like 2 to 3 atm. My colleagues at Jefferson lab and at Daresbury lab have reached slightly higher voltages (~480-500kV), even though their ceramic has a smaller diameter, thus higher fields on the central tube. This leads me to believe that my geometry should be good for well over 600kV if theirs reaches 500. Both labs did have punch-thrus at the 480kV levels., though. Their processing resistor chains are about 2X longer than mine. All this evidence points me towards believing that the resistor

is the weak link, not necessarily the insulator Summary Overall, the gun itself has been very reliable, at lower than desired voltages. Cathode lifetime is poor for high average currents, with heavy ion damage Field emission from the cathode surface cause DC dark current Cathode surface roughening a potential problem Processing resistor design is poor and a potential cause of insulator failures Processing techniques and procedures need improvement Need more laser power and/or better cathode QE (with better lifetime) to make progress much past 25 mA.

Need to find the source of the anomalous events at high average current. Gun vacuum is ok, need to improve the pressure between the gun and ICM.

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • First Year Information Session 2019

    First Year Information Session 2019

    For subjects with a non-ACTL subject code, an average of 73 is required (with no fails) For subjects with an ACTL subject code, satisfactory performance in the end-of- semester exams is required. Cannot be certain about new Foundation Program or...
  • Writing Leads

    Writing Leads

    When developing a lead ask yourself… Is the information in a single sentence with facts arranged from most important to least important? Is the sentence free of unattributed opinion? Is it 25 words or less? Is the sentence in active...
  • Class Five - Carleton University

    Class Five - Carleton University

    Everything and the Kitchen Sink: Experimenting with E-learning Tools October 21, 2011 Professor T. Brettel Dawson, Law
  • Learning to Recognise and Remove Barriers to Healing

    Learning to Recognise and Remove Barriers to Healing

    Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord. 15 And the prayer of faith will save (s. ō. z. ō =heal) the one...
  • Life above 70cm?

    Life above 70cm?

    Examples 70, 23, 13 & 3 cm. GPS locking etc. Typical transverter: Block diagram 3 cm with Gunn diodes The old way; using gun diodes or even Klystrons for wideband FM working. Simple to build with 30 MHz IF. Generally...
  • Epidemiologic Transition - Mr Lindberg's AP Human Geography

    Epidemiologic Transition - Mr Lindberg's AP Human Geography

    Epidemiologic Transition: Distinctive causes of death in each stage of the demographic transition. Abdel Omran (1971) Stage 1. Infectious, parasitic, accidents, animal attacks
  • CDR Project Presentation to TPTF

    CDR Project Presentation to TPTF

    Current Day Reports (CDR) Project Michael Daskalantonakis & Brian Cook Revised 1/26/08
  • EOSC 112: THE FLUID EARTH - University of British Columbia

    EOSC 112: THE FLUID EARTH - University of British Columbia

    Arial Arial Rounded MT Bold Times Symbol Helvetica Default Design EOSC 112: THE FLUID EARTH 1. Figures representing P change and T change with height Atmospheric pressure Atmospheric Temperature 2.