Presented By: Lloyd Waguespack, Deputy Chief of Staff,

Presented By: Lloyd Waguespack, Deputy Chief of Staff,

Presented By: Lloyd Waguespack, Deputy Chief of Staff, Mayors Office Barbara E. Hartle, Director and Presiding Judge Sahira J. Abdool, Chief Clerk Randy Zamora, Chief Prosecutor, Legal Department The following Executive Summary outlines initiatives that have been implemented by the Municipal Courts, the Houston Police Department, and the Legal Department in an effort to not only improve the efficiency of the City of Houston Municipal Court System, but also to achieve overall cost savings. These efforts closely align with the Houston Police Departments assessment of the Municipal Courts issued April 2010 entitled Citation Workflow Processes, as well as FY11 Budget Amendment 8.07 outlined below. This document identifies five (5) key areas of improvement, the current status of these objectives, and supporting worksheets and statistics. Amendment 8.07: The Chief of Police, City Attorney, Presiding Judge of the Municipal Courts, and Chief Clerk shall report to City Council by September 1, 2010 on a plan to reduce wait time and improve efficiencies for police officers at Houston Municipal Courts. One of the major issues identified by HPDs April 2010 report was the amount of time officers spent at the Municipal Courthouse waiting for a case to proceed to a jury trial. The report recommended that the officer subpoena time be modified, requiring the officers to appear at 1:00 p.m. rather than 8:00 a.m., thus decreasing court overtime and increasing court efficiency. HPD identified the high cost of officers honoring subpoenas is a major source of their overtime budget. Officers must often attend court for hours before they discover that the case will be reset, dismissed due to reasons other than officer error, or that they are otherwise not needed. Solution: Effective July 26, 2010 officers scheduled for a trial by jury appear in court at

1:00pm instead of at 8:00am or 10:30am, with the exception of Impact Court cases and Hot List subpoenas. This was stated in a circular issued by HPD Chief McClellend, Jr. and in a Judicial Order issued by the Presiding Judge, Barbara Hartle. Goal: The goal of this measure is to reduce officer wait time when appearing for a jury trial. Records reflect that 90% of cases were not tried until after 1:00pm (Attachment A). In the majority of cases, by the time a jury trial began, officers had been waiting 4-5 hours, most of it on the overtime rate, a waste of valuable City resources. As a result of the Courts recent presentation to the Public Safety Committee, further review and refinement of the officer subpoena directive is currently in progress in order to arrive at a more ideal model of efficiency for both officers and defendants. The first change to the Policy will become effective September 7, 2010, where Third Shift Officers assigned to a Patrol Division will report for jury Performance Reporting: As part of the Departments Performance Measures, officer wait time in court has been closely tracked since FY08. The Goal from FY08-FY10 was 4:25 (HR:MM). For FY11, this Performance Measure Goal was reduced from 4:25 (HR:MIN) to 3:45. Court records reflect that there has been a marked decrease in the amount of time officers are spending in court for a jury trial setting since the Judicial Order became effective.

Reduction of Officer Overtime Compensation: HPD has analyzed HPD court overtime for the last 9 pay periods, and have compared these periods to the same periods from the prior year. HPD considers this recent data promising, and though it would seem that the new policy is the causal factor for the reduced OT, only one full pay period has been evaluated. In the past, we have learned that many elements can move the numbers. More time is needed to fully evaluate the trends and rule out other influencing factors. Please refer to Attachments C1-C3 Please refer to Attachment B Enhanced HPD Liaison Role: Specialized Tracking Reports: Identification of Top 250 Ticket Writer Report Percentage of Total Tickets Issued by Top 250 Officers Subpoena Summary Subpoena Disposition Case Disregard Docket Disregard HPD has also enhanced the scope of duties of its HPD Liaison section in order to provide a more comprehensive assistance to prosecutors and court personnel in contacting officers on a daily basis. They also provide a

daily Disregard List, which identifies officers who have approved vacation/sick time scheduled, or have subpoenas from higher jurisdiction courts. An equally important issue is the amount of time that defendants spend at the Municipal Courthouse waiting for a case to proceed to a jury trial. Solution: Currently, defendants and their attorney are subpoenaed to appear at 8:00am or 10:30am. The Courts have established guidelines for prioritizing jury cases. Goal: The goal of this measure is to reduce defendant wait time when appearing for a jury trial and to provide a more date-certain trial setting. Records reflect that 90% of cases were not tried until after 1:00pm (Attachment A). The City of Houston Municipal Court, the largest court in the State of Texas, has eight courts that conduct jury trials. Each of these courts is capped at 260 cases per day. The 8:00am/10:30am subpoena time allows for plea bargaining between defendants, attorneys and prosecutors and prioritizing cases for trial to occur. The long term goal for the Municipal Courts is to shorten the average total disposition time of a jury case to 2 years. Defendant Release Court Policy: Performance Reporting: As part of the Departments Performance Measures, jury defendant wait time in court has been closely tracked since FY08. The Goal from FY08-FY10 was 3:25 (HR:MM). For FY11,

this Performance Measure Goal was reduced from 3:25 (HR:MIN) to 3:00. Court records reflect that there has been a slight increase in the amount of time defendants are spending in court for a jury trial setting since the Judicial Order became effective, but the reports do not include the time from when the defendant is released by the Court until returning at 1:00pm. Please refer to Attachment B Monitor Case Resets: The Court will also monitor the number of case resets in order to identify trends. The Court has initiated a policy by which defendants, their counsel if represented, check in at 8:00am/10:30am. All parties have the opportunity to discuss their case with a Prosecutor, negotiate a plea bargain, or request Discretionary Defensive Driving or Deferred Disposition from the Court. If no agreement can be reached, defendants and defense attorneys are released by the Judge and instructed to return at 1:00 p.m. for jury trial. Cases involving non-HPD officers as the primary witnesses may begin prior to noon. Monitor Juror Levels: The juror component is imperative to court operations. Currently, jurors are summoned to appear at either 10:30 a.m. or 12:30 p.m. MondayFriday. On average, only 85 jurors appear as compared with to the 450 that were summoned. In collaboration with the vendor, the Court routinely

monitors and adjusts the number of jurors summoned in order to meet the needs of the trial courts. The Court closely monitors the number of jurors that appear to serve each day and adjusts the numbers summoned in order to maximize the number available to the courts. Many customer-driven initiatives have been implemented and other initiatives are in the planning stages that will expand court services and enhance options available to defendants. Solution: Continue to seek ways to expand web-based processes, options by mail, and to increase neighborhood-oriented government through satellite courts and payment kiosks. Goal: Our goal is to seek better ways to serve the public including streamlining court services, offering expanded/enhanced web-based and mail options, bringing court services to key areas within the City, and more effective scheduling of officers to reduce overtime compensation, and to maximize their role as peace officers in the community. Motorola Hand Held Ticket Devises: Jury Docket Expansion: The Department will begin scheduling biweekly jury dockets at the Westside Command Station Court effective fall 2010. This expansion will not only offer law enforcement officers working out of that area to have their cases scheduled where they work, it will also alleviate congestion at the central courthouse. The Court plans to follow the jury docket expansion to other locations including Southeast Command Station and North

Command. Kingwood Expansion: Annex HPD has agreed to purchase 300 additional new generation handheld units. These units will enhance the accuracy of citation information and the timely entry of citations into the Courts information system. The current Motorola Handheld devices have reached end of life and usability and present challenges for both HPD and the Courts. Funding for the 300 newgeneration handheld devices has been secured through EAF funds as well as from the Technology Fee Fund. Working with HPD, the Courts have coordinated the selection/procurement process and partnered on the technical development for the deployment that is scheduled to be fully implemented late FY11. A demonstration of the devices is planned for the Public Safety Committee prior to Go-Live. Finally, HPD has agreed to fund the maintenance costs for years one through five for these first 300 devices at an estimated annual cost of $50K. Court The Department has expanded the hours of operation at the Kingwood Court in response to high volume. The previous hours were on Wednesdays from 8:00am5:00pm. The new hours of operation are now 8:00am-7:00pm. Also, the physical expansion of the current space at the Kingwood Court is in the planning stages. Once the remodel has

been completed, the new space will be able to accommodate arraignment and Bench Trial dockets. Impact Docket: A specialized docket was developed and implemented in FY09 to address multi-case/violation defendants who are scheduled for a jury trial. The types of cases scheduled to this docket include Neighborhood Protection violations and 8-liner violations. This specialized docket relieves the jury trial courts from the complexity and duration of these types of cases, and allows them to handle the other cases scheduled for jury trial. A prosecutor familiar with these types of cases has been permanently assigned to handle these dockets. Regularly Meetings with Defense Bar: Payment Kiosks: In HPDs April 2010 report, they suggested the use of retail establishments as an alternative location for citizens to dispose of their Court fines. The payment kiosk program offers the benefits of enhanced customer service, reduced citizen wait-time,

streamlining of efficiency and accuracy, and offering a point-of-service closer to the customers needs. By installing kiosks in retail hubs as mentioned earlier, this purpose would be served. The first payment kiosk became operational on March 29, 2010, and is located at the central court location, 1400 Lubbock. We anticipate expansion of the kiosk program to include satellite court locations and/or key retail hubs. e-Query: eQuery provides stakeholders access to cases and events information housed in the Integrated Case Management System. This service has provided stakeholders the opportunity to directly research and obtain the information they need without going through 3-1-1 or appear in person at the court. The data is refreshed daily and, after registering with the Court, can be accessed via the Web using a search based on name, case number, attorney bar card number, or bond/power number. This service has been well received by external stakeholders and has significantly reduced the call volume for 3-1-1 and the HPD Jail. The Presiding Judge will continue to foster cooperation and collaboration with members of the defense bar by hosting regular monthly open-discussion meetings with the judicial staff, attending periodic defense bar luncheons/meetings, and inviting their input on various court-related issues. Attorney Annex/Attorney Drop-Off Service: The Attorney Annex was developed in order to provide a specific forum for attorneys to handle offdocket matters. The hours of operation are Mondays,

Wednesdays, and Fridays, from 3pm-5pm, in Court No. 7. A specific Judge is assigned to efficiently handle the matters presented by attorneys on behalf of their clients. Also, the Attorney Annex hours of operation will soon be expanded from the current 3:00pm-5:00pm to 1:00pm-4:30pm. The regular Annex Court is also available to attorneys to handle off docket matters on a first come, first serve basis. The Attorney Drop-off service is a courtesy extended by the Public Services Division to the Defense Attorneys to enable them to drop off multiple bonds and case re-set requests (re-sets may also be submitted by mail). This reduces the amount of time attorneys spend waiting in line for their requests to be completed. This also allows staff to process individual requests more quickly and in so doing expedite the process and reduce wait time. Court Performance Measures requires that these batches be handled within 5 business days of drop off and this measure has been met consistently. One Call Solution Center: Enhanced Arraignment Noticing: The goal of this initiative is to offer defendants 24-hour access to court services. These options include requesting DSC, Deferred Adjudication, submission of compliance documents, payment of fines, case resets, and general court/case information. The goal of this initiative is to offer alternative options to those who receive a citation rather than appearing in person. The Courts will be implementing a revised

arraignment notice postcard that will include web, mail and telephone options available to defendants, with the goal of reducing the number of cases that are set for jury trial by outlining alternative case resolution methods. The One Call Solution Center is now equipped with a 24-hour Interactive Voice Response (IVR) telephone line that provides callers with court information in English and Spanish. Information via the IVR is provided upon request 24 hours, seven days a week and 365 days a year. Web-based and Mail Court Processes: The Courts currently offer various web-based options and options by mail to defendants and will work in partnership with other stakeholders to develop and/or improve web-based processes including entering a plea, requesting a trial, requesting the Driver Safety Course and Deferred Disposition, submitting proof of compliance and post compliance documents. This is an on-going initiative and the Court will continue to streamline, expand and enhance the number of webbased options and options by mail available to the general public and allowed by law, including requests for trial. Jail CourtView Access: Jail personnel have the ability to view jail docket cases as they progress through the Courts Integrated Case Management System (ICMS). By allowing jail personnel access to the ICSM system, HPD is able to verify if a prisoner has seen a judge, check the case disposition, and assist in efficient prisoner handling. Warrant Verification:

In their April review, HPD noted the difficulty officers have with the warrant verification process and requested ways to reduce wait time on warrant inquiries. Additionally, HPD requested that the Courts collaborate with Texas Online to allow for a continuation of verification during the Texas Onlines bi-weekly maintenance downtime periods. CSMART: Revision of Ordinance # 86-1447: The Courts will present for City Council approval the final draft of revisions to Ordinance # 86-1447. Originally passed by City Council in 1986, this Ordinance established the official rules of practice and procedure for the Municipal Courts, also known as Local Rules. Revisions to the Ordinance will include the various Court processes established as a result of the ICMS as well as operational guidelines. Proposed Legislation - 82nd Session: The Municipal Courts has submitted for consideration legislative initiatives related to the improvement of Court operations. These include: The electronic transcription

of court proceedings; Expansion of scope of Juvenile Case Manager Fund; Increases to technology and building security fees; Setting post-compliance fees at a uniform amount of $20. CSMART will reduce citizen wait time by improving system performance and implementing process improvements. CSMART is expected to improve: Reduce Citizen Wait Time at the Annex Court - CSMART will allow Alternative Sentencing Request and Court Resets to be processed in one transaction at the Public Service Counter (PSC). This will eliminate the citizen from having to endure a longer wait time at the Annex Court. Reduce Citizen Wait Time at the Jail - HPD will have direct access to CSMART without using existing interfaces. This will allow for faster access to defendant information and will expedite the release process. The ability to capture defendant's signature while in custody and other CSMART processes will reduce the wait time for bonding. Reduce Officer Wait Time - Police officer wait time will be reduced due to improved performance of the new CSMART application. Increased system speed allows for faster processing of cases, therefore reducing the amount of time an officer will have to wait for a judge to process a case and dismiss the officer from the court room. The project is expected to be operational in 2012. HPD identified the diffused authority structure that exists within

the court complex. There are three executive-level department heads co-existing within one entity of the municipal courts with no single authority to which all are answerable. Solution: The Mayor plans to consolidate the Municipal Courts Judicial Department and the Municipal Courts Administration Department into one Municipal Court entity, with one Chief Executive, the Presiding Judge, overseeing the overall operations of the court system and answerable to the Mayor. Goal: The goal of this measure is to improve communication and efficiency, unify the decision making process, reduce duplication of services, and provide a more streamlined organization model. Cost savings as a result of consolidation and reorganization of personnel may also be realized. In order to achieve the desired department organizational structure, input from various City Departments will be imperative to maximize efficiency and cost-savings. Assistance from the Legal Department: The City Attorney is currently drafting revisions to the Code of Ordinances that govern the Courts structure that will be presented to City Council within the month of September. Assistance from Human Resources Department: The organizational structures of both departments is under review and will be discussed with the Human Resources Department to identify overlaps and establish a revised model under one Chief Executive. A rough draft of the upper tier personnel structure will be presented to the Mayors Office for review and further development. Assistance from Finance Department: The Finance Department will also assist in transitioning both operating budgets and specialty funds under one

authority. Several meetings with the Federal Jail Inspector, the Presiding Judge, HPD and City officials have been held to address overcrowding issues at our City jail facilities. Solution: Seek effective measures to reduce the jail population at City facilities and to expedite the handling of detainees including revision of Judicial Policy to increase the amount of credit received for time served, and offering additional jail dockets, including evenings, holidays and weekends. Review current policies, and current, historical, and comparative data to formulate initiatives that will assist in reducing the jail population at City facilities and to expedite the handling of detainees. To assist in this initiative, the Judicial Policy governing the amount of credit for time served has been revised to increase the amount of credit received while in custody. The Courts, in collaboration with HPD, has agreed to expand evening, weekend and holiday jail dockets. Goal: Our goal is to expedite the processing of individuals in custody including offering enhanced/centralized Magistrate services, additional jail dockets, and expanded video arraignment capability. Continue discussions with Harris County officials to consider the viability of a joint Central Jail Processing Center, and also to explore the development of an alternative Jail Processing Center along with HPD and with the Mayors Office Chief Development Officer, Mr. Andy Icken. Status: Continue discussions with all stakeholders to implement proposed short and long- Data for this Presentation was provided by: Joseph Fenninger, CFO, HPD Mary Hammond, Chief Clerks Office Lilly Warden, Presiding Judges Office

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • L.O: To examine the author's use of forceful and brutal language

    L.O: To examine the author's use of forceful and brutal language

    Think back to the 'The Carew Murder Case', consider: How the author has made the scene seem brutal. How we are supposed to react. The events and why they matter to the story. L.O: To examine the author's use of...
  • スライド 1

    スライド 1

    Model bias and VarBC. Change of observing system can be a cause of a jump in a time series. Variational Bias Correction is a superior method to remove such "jumps" but the field converges asymptotically to the model climatologywithout anchoring...
  • CV Risk Reduction in diabetes: How does it change my clinical ...

    CV Risk Reduction in diabetes: How does it change my clinical ...

    Before we look at the key learnings from these trials one thing that is worth noting are the key differences between some of these trials. As we discussed, UKPDS recruited newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas patients recruited...
  • The Dental Quality Alliance (DQA) Overview and Work

    The Dental Quality Alliance (DQA) Overview and Work

    DQA Administrative Claims Based Program and Plan Level Pediatric Measures. To date, DQA has developed a set of 12 pediatric and 2 adult claims administrative program and plan level dental quality measures.
  • Are We Sustainable? Asking the Right Questions

    Are We Sustainable? Asking the Right Questions

    WELCOME! ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY cohort program * MATRIX MAP EXAMPLE WHAT THE MATRIX MAP SHOWS: What we do (bubbles) Mix of mission-specific (blue) and fund development programs (green) (color of bubbles) Where we are investing our resources (size of bubbles) The...
  • 21st Century Civic Literacy Rebecca Tinder Bowles Rice

    21st Century Civic Literacy Rebecca Tinder Bowles Rice

    No Child Left Behind identifies civics as one of the core academic subject areas essential to a good education. The focus on core subjects must expand beyond minimal mastery to high levels of understanding and skill. Civics is not just...
  • HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis after sexual contact

    HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis after sexual contact

    Times New Roman Angsana New Arial Wingdings Tahoma Maple 1_Maple CorelDRAW HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis after Sexual Contact HIV Transmission Through Sexual Contact Number of People with HIV/AIDS by Region PowerPoint Presentation Facts Factors justify the administration of NONOPEP 1. Biological...
  • JAMES MADISON HIGH SCHOOL Information Session 2019 Madison

    JAMES MADISON HIGH SCHOOL Information Session 2019 Madison

    Brandi Boyd— [email protected] ... Sylvia Rodriguez. [email protected] Get College Ready (It's never too early) Explore what you want to study. Get Involved in extracurriculars both in and out of school. Start your resume. Take courses that challenge you.