HOW TO WRITE AN EFFECTIVE SCIENTIFIC PAPER Daniel

HOW TO WRITE AN EFFECTIVE SCIENTIFIC PAPER Daniel

HOW TO WRITE AN EFFECTIVE SCIENTIFIC PAPER Daniel J. Jacob Disclaimers: General rules suffer plenty of exceptions; each paper is a unique situation Dont let me tell you how to write, let me try to improve YOUR writing WHAT IS A SCIENTIFIC PAPER? It is an addition to human knowledge; this is a reversible statement (addition of knowledge takes place through scientific papers) Sharks (reviewers) OCEAN OF IGNORANCE Island of Human Knowledge your paper

A scientific paper is not: - a technical report or term paper - a paper is worth writing only if it has general implications for knowledge - a gospel - paper should be scholarly but youre not writing for the ages others will come after you with newer data and better models. Think of your role as guiding their future efforts - being occasionally wrong is forgiven, being boring is not. WHY WRITE SCIENTIFIC PAPERS? Scientists are motivated by two things: (1) to understand the world, (2) to get credit for it A scientific career is all about expansion of human knowledge In the academic and public sectors, scientific papers ARE the means for this expansion.

Publish or Perish should indeed be the rule for scientists working as individuals - scientific papers ARE your professional contribution. You dont publish, youre out. Quantity doesnt matter beyond an expected number quality is what matters What determines the perceived quality of a scientific paper? (now routinely- perhaps unfortunately measured by the citation index) Originality and importance of ideas Effectiveness of communication, particularly when it comes to planting the flag for new ideas Advertising: presentations, communications at meetings and with visitors, email exchanges, citations VIEW PAPER WRITING AS PART OF YOUR RESEARCH, NOT A POST-RESEARCH ACCOUNT The paper is not a description ot the work, it IS the work Richard Feynman said something like this

Start writing the paper as soon as possible view it as a tool of your research. Iterate and agonize over the paper as part of your research Write the intro as you engage into your research what are you trying to do? Why is it important? What has been done before? Write the Methods once you think theyre mature can you defend them in writing? If you have difficulty in the writing that often means theres a problem with the methods Write results and discussions as the ideas come to you spend an hour here and there writing them down in paper form. That will help crystallize them in your mind and may lead to new ideas Spend a bit of time each day with your evolving paper. Try to go through it with the eyes of a critical reader (be your own worst critic!) PREPARING YOUR PAPER FOR CONSUMPTION Play to your customer base! Think of HOW scientists (e.g., you!) read papers. Very few will read your paper in a thorough and deliberate way, from beginning to end.

You have to market your paper for the casual readers! Title and abstract are for the search enginesmost readers will not go beyond that. Figures + captions and Tables + footnotes must be self-containeda lot of readers go through those w/out reading the text. Some may look for quick explanation in text, so discussion of figures/tables in text should jump at reader (I like paragraphs starting with Figure X shows Make your figures attractive for use in presentations, both by you and others. If you wouldnt use a figure in a presentation, then fix or delete the figure! Many readers are interested in your paper mainly because they want some specific numbers, or a synthesis or references to previous work; oblige them by being scholarly. The take-home messages of the paper should be in your face, I.e., in abstract, in intro, in conclusions, to make sure the diagonal reader gets the message. Dont be shy about planting the flag. THE INTRODUCTION write it first do it early, revisit often; use it to think about what your paper is about, to test your command of the literature Time-honored approach: begin with a mini-review and finish the intro

by saying what your paper is about Better (I think), more direct approach: First paragraph: state succinctly the problem dont encumber with too many refs At end of first paragraph or beginning of second: tell us in one sentence what your paper is about Second and following paragraphs: now that you told us what your paper is about, give us the background information, what people have done before, the limitations, etc. (copious referencing) Last paragraph: elaborate on what youll be doing in your paper. A few words about references

Showing command of the literature is extremely important. You need to describe the foundation on which your contribution to human knowledge is based. Extensive referencing is the scholarly and ethical thing to do, its also useful to readers and it makes your paper more accessible by search engines! So be serious about literature search and reading papers devote a bit of time to this each day. Use search engines (like SCI) to search forward in time. Never cite a paper for which you havent read at least the relevant part. Cite papers in a context that makes it clear what the paper did otherwise the reference is useless. If youre not clear on what the paper youre citing actualy did, go back and (re-)read the paper its the intellectually honest thing to do and you may learn something. Dont cite textbooks they may be difficult for reader to access, information may be buried. Theres nothing wrong with citing yourself or your group extensively in fact thats normal since thats the work you typically build on, and thats part of advertising. But dont ignore what others have done! References should be helpful to the reader, not of historical interest (unless youre writing a review) Methods section following the Intro

Write this as soon as you think that your methods are mature the writing process will make you check whether they really are Often youll be working with a complicated model or using a messy data set. Focus your methods section solely on what is important for your paper. Reference other papers for peripheral information. Provide useful numbers for future modelers to use Make sure all math is clean (next slide) A few words about math Equations are often necessary to describe methods, but can also be an

excellent way to set the stage sometimes your arguments can be encapsulated neatly in an equation. Peripheral equations should be avoided or moved to an Appendix dont force the reader to understand something thats not crucial to the paper There is no excuse for math errors, yet they happen to the best of us check and double-check. Define all terms in your equations. Your notation should be textbook-quality. Dont use words or multi-letter variables in equations. Always try to make your equations more compact and reduce their number (but dont skip steps in derivation). Use standard notation and terminology as much as possible it makes it easier for the reader to follow. Results sections

Use section headers descriptive of the science: Model comparison to observations, Results and discussion are generally not good. Progress from general to specific If not clear from the header, start the section with a brief statement of what its about Start by presenting your results (Figure X shows) and then discuss what they mean Logical, linear flow of thought is essential youve thought a lot about your results and what they mean, share this progression with reader One theme per paragraph first sentence lays out the theme, last sentence provides link to next paragraph. Few paragraphs need to be longer than page longer than 1 page is sure sign of confused thinking. Quantitative uncertainty estimates are invaluable, but dont wring your hands about lack of confidence in your results! The reader expects you to focus on what you can say with confidence. A few words about comparing model with observations Nobody believes a modeling paper except the author, everybody believes an observational paper except the author

Comparisons with observations should have a clear purpose in terms of learning about the atmosphere. You should tell us what features youre looking for No one cares that the model does a good job, is in reasonable agreement, etc. What are you actually testing in the model? What increased confidence in terms of processes are you getting from the comparison? Can you usefully make the comparison quantitative? Abstract and Conclusions can wait to be written until rest of paper is mature Abstract is of course the most important part of the paper many readers will read just that. Focus on what is new - essential ideas, essential numbers. One fact/idea per sentence. Everything that you would like the casual reader to remember should be there. Most (but not all!) papers need a conclusions section. A default approach is to treat it as an extended abstract. But this is also an opportunity to be reflective about what you learned, the

uncertainties remaining, the links to other problems, etc. First paragraph: focus on what you did. Begin with We have used, We have investigated Following paragraphs: one major finding per paragraph. First sentence states the finding, following sentences elaborate. Final paragraph should have some forward-looking perspective. Dont let paper finish on a whimper! Some general editorial remarks - Dr. So-and-so, your presentation was just superfluous! When will it be published? - It will be published posthumously - Wondeful! I cant wait! Strive for logical, linear flow. Put yourself in the perspective of the reader. Be as short as possible. Every word must hurt Be on the lookout for unnecessary words and sentences.

Use short words (e.g., use vs. utiilize) Remove value judgments: Surprising, interesting, unfortunately have no place in a scientific paper. but not all words must be short. Use strong, effective words with precise meaning. Build your vocabulary . Love the English language. Crosswords, manuals of style, language columns Use scientific words as much as possible but with their precise meaning. Beware of words with different scientific vs. lay meanings, such as significant, ideal. Use them in their scientific meaning. A scientific paper is above all about being clear, objective, to the point. This means forgetting some rules learned in expo writing. For example, theres nothing wrong with starting a sentence with a symbol. Nothing wrong with starting a sentence with But (it beats the tired However). Nothing wrong with repetitions if they enhance clarity, and often they do.

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Vocabulary Week 30

    Vocabulary Week 30

    result of training but rather are innate. Please guess the definition… inborn; natural. innate is an adjective. synonyms: unlearned, existing naturally. antonym: trained. Now please write a sentence with context clues and use the word correctly.
  • WORD JUMBLE - University of Scranton

    WORD JUMBLE - University of Scranton

    WORD JUMBLE Enter the definition or hint for the word here Word in jumbled form _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Next Question Using the Jumble Word Template Copy the PowerPoint presentation to your hard drive. Open the...
  • Jackson Pollock Template - My ePortfolio

    Jackson Pollock Template - My ePortfolio

    A design principle that emphasizes differences between the art elements. For example, a painting may have bright colors that contrast with dull colors or angular shapes that contrast with rounded shapes. Sharp contrast draws attention and can direct a viewer...
  • Component-Based & Software Reuse Dr. M.E. Fayad, Professor

    Component-Based & Software Reuse Dr. M.E. Fayad, Professor

    Questions for the Next Lectures More on Class Diagrams Software Stability Enduring Business Concepts (EBTs) Business Objects (BOs) Industrial Objects (IOs) 2 Lesson 03-3: Samples of Class Diagrams * * Lesson Objectives 3 Understand How to put together a class...
  • MLA: Document formatting - gilpinshs.weebly.com

    MLA: Document formatting - gilpinshs.weebly.com

    Teacher's name (include title, like "Ms." or "Dr.") Class name and period. European-style Date (Day Month Year, no commas) Just like the rest of the document, these should be double spaced with no extra "returns" or space between them
  • History of Britain 5000-55 BC Stonehenge- 2200-1300 BC ...

    History of Britain 5000-55 BC Stonehenge- 2200-1300 BC ...

    History of Britain 5000-55 BC Stonehenge- 2200-1300 BC Avebury- 2000- 1600 BC 900 - Alfred died - England stronger and united Danes kept at bay by Alfred's son Edward and daughter Ethelfelda - wife of Ethelred 973 - Edgar accepted...
  • Time and Frequency: Measurements and Applications

    Time and Frequency: Measurements and Applications

    National measurement standards may be primary standards, which are primary realizations of the SI units or agreed representations of SI units based on fundamental physical constants, or they may be secondary standards which are standards calibrated by another national metrology...
  • Chapter 21: Metamorphism - Stellenbosch University

    Chapter 21: Metamorphism - Stellenbosch University

    Pelites in Southern Africa Barberton Granite-Greenstone Belt, Mpumalanga Damara Orogen, Namibia Contact metamorphism associated with Bushveld Complex, Limpopo Province Metamorphism of Pelites IN THIS LECTURE Types of Protoliths Examples of Metamorphism Orogenic Metamorphism of the Scottish ...