Overview of Nondiscrimination Testing for 401(k) Plans John

Overview of Nondiscrimination Testing for 401(k) Plans John D. Lestock, CPP, CEBS Annual Testing Top-Heavy Status Minimum Coverage Testing IRC 410(b) Minimum Participation Requirement IRC 401(a)(26) For defined benefit plans only Nondiscrimination Testing 415 Limits Definitions Nondiscrimination testing plan must not discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees in terms of percentage of compensation actually deferred by participants. Nonhighly compensated employee (NHCE) someone who is not an HCE Highly compensated employee (HCE): 1. 2. 3. 5% owner of employers stock or capital at any time during current or preceding year,

or received annual compensation greater than $120,000 (for 2015 or 2016) during the preceding year employer can limit employees fitting second definition to those in top-paid 20% of employees during preceding year top-paid group election Definitions Elective deferrals may be pre-tax, after tax (designated Roth contributions), or combination of two. 402(g) limit for 2016 is $18,000 Nonelective contributions employer contribution made on participants behalf; no election by participant is required. Annual compensation limit employee compensation to be included in calculation of pension benefit or employer contribution is limited under IRC 401(a)(17). For 2016, annual compensation limit is $265,000. Compensation limit also used in nondiscrimination testing. Excess Deferrals elective deferrals that exceed individual deferral limit Excess Contributions failure of ADP test results in excess contributions for HCEs Excess Aggregate Contributions failure of ACP test results in excess aggregate contributions for HCEs Definitions Catch-up contributions employees eligible to make elective deferrals and who would be at least 50 years old by the end of the plan year can defer an additional

amount as a catch-up contribution beyond limits set by law or by the plan itself (i.e. statutory limit, employer-provided limit, actual deferral percentage (ADP) limit). Limit is lesser of applicable dollar amount or employees compensation for the year reduced by other elective deferrals made during the year. Applicable dollar limit for 401(k) plans for 2016 is $6,000. Elective deferrals are treated as catch-up contributions if they exceed any otherwise applicable limit determined as of the end of the plan year Statutory limit is IRC limit on elective deferrals or annual additions Employer-provided limit is limit on elective deferrals contained in the plan provisions that is not statutory limit (i.e. lower limit) Actual deferral percentage (ADP) limit is highest dollar amount of elective deferrals that may be retained in plan by HCE after ADP testing Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test Discrimination test for 401(K) plans actual deferral percentage test (ADP) of employees who are eligible to participate in the plan; calculate actual deferral ratio (ADR) Employees annual elective deferrals Employees ADR = -------------------------------------------------------- x 100 Employees total annual compensation Catch-up contributions are not included in employee deferrals and employees total annual compensation taken into account cannot exceed annual compensation limit ($265,000 for 2016) Then, ADPs for nonhighly compensated employees (NHCEs) and highly compensated employees

(HCEs) are averaged for each group by adding them together and dividing by number of employees Average ADP for HCEs may not be greater than: 1.25 x average ADP of NHCEs or Lesser of: 2 x average ADP for NHCEs or 2% more than average ADP for NHCEs Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test Plan document defines compensation for ADP testing; does not have to be same as compensation used for other purposes (i.e. elective deferrals) Ratios are calculated to two decimal places (nearest 1/100th of a percent) Eligible participants who chose not to defer have ADRs of zero when calculating group averages In calendar year plan, level at which HCEs may defer is determined by NHCEs ADP from prior year prior year testing method; allows plan sponsor to know what HCEs ADP limit is for year Alternatively, plan can use current year testing method, where current year HCEs ADP is measured against current year NHCEs ADP; may need mid-year test to estimate results Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test If 401(k) plan meets one of ADP tests, it is deemed to have met general nondiscrimination tests regarding contributions that apply to all qualified retirement plans under 401(a)(4)

Parallel tests for matching and after-tax contributions IRC 401(m) contains tests similar to ADP test that show whether there has been discrimination in favor of HCEs in terms of employer matching contributions and employee after-tax contributions actual contributions percentage (ACP) test ADP and ACP tests are exclusive nondiscrimination tests for 401(k) plans cannot use general nondiscrimination test of 401(a)(4) Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test Example: Prior Year ADP Test Name Current Year Current Year Elective Compensation Deferrals (2016) (2016) HCE 1 150,000

7,000 4.67% NHCE 1 45,000.00 2,000.00 4.44% HCE 2 150,000 6,000 4.00% NHCE 2

32,500.00 - 0.00% HCE 3 Total 95,000 5,000 5.26% 13.93% NHCE 3 NHCE 4 NHCE 5 30,000.00 28,000.00 25,000.00

1,500.00 840.00 1,250.00 5.00% 3.00% 5.00% NHCE 6 NHCE 7 Total 24,000.00 16,500.00 1,500.00 - 6.25% 0.00% 23.69%

2016 ADP for HCEs = 13.93% / 3 = 4.64% Current Year ADR (2016) Name Prior Year Compensation (2015) Prior Year Elective Deferrals (2015) 2015 ADP for HCEs = 23.69% / 7 = 3.38% Prior Year ADR (2015) Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test Example (Cont):

Test Results 1. Basic Test - 125% of NHCE ADP 3.38% x 125% = 4.23% 2. Alternative Test - lesser of NHCE ADP + 2% or NHCE ADP x 2 3.38% + 2% = 5.38% 3.38% x 2 = 6.76% Greater of "1" or "2" 5.38% HCE ADP 4.64% Since ADP for HCEs is less than 5.38%, test is satisfied Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test

What if the test fails? Two options: 1. 2. Raise NHCE averages to achieve passing results; or Distribute sufficient excess contributions to affected HCEs so that HCE averages are lowered to acceptable levels To raise NHCE averages plan makes qualified nonelective contributions (QNECs) for NHCEs that can be taken into consideration for ADP test purposes QNECs must be 100% vested when made and subject to same withdrawal restrictions as elective deferrals Example provide all NHCEs QNEC of 3% Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test To lower HCE average accomplished in two steps: First, total dollar amount of correction is calculated by lowering individual ADRs in turn, beginning with the HCE who deferred the highest percentage of compensation, until the HCEs ADP reaches the required level in this step, no HCE actually receives a distribution Second, total dollar amount of correction from Step 1 is apportioned among HCEs, beginning with the HCE who deferred the highest dollar amount into

plan HCEs who receive corrective distributions are those who deferred the highest dollar amounts into plan (not necessarily same HCEs who deferred highest percentage of compensation) Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test HCE 2016 Compensation Elective Deferral ADR A 100,000 8,000 8.00%

B 265,000 18,000 6.79% C 171,428 12,000 7.00% Step 1: HCE A with 8% ADR would have deferrals limited to $7,000 ($100,000 x 7%) adds $1,000 to total dollar amount of correction ($8,000 - $7,000); HCE A does not actually receive distribution of $1,000 Step 2: HCE B, deferring $18,000, would receive corrective distribution of $1,000 since HCE B deferred highest dollar amount into plan, exceeding next highest dollar contribution by more than total amount of correction

Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test Note if plan allows catch-up contributions, reaching an ADP test limit would trigger catch-up contribution eligibility for HCEs who are at least age 50 by end of calendar year. Thus, corrective distribution must be reclassified as catch-up contribution and retained in the plan. Catch-up contributions are not included in ADP or ACP tests reclassification is considered correction of test failure Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test Example: Name ADP Test Correction Current Year Current Year Elective Current Compensation Deferrals Year ADR (2016) (2016) (2016)

HCE 1 150,000 7,000 4.67% HCE 2 150,000 6,000 4.00% HCE 3 95,000 5,000 5.26%

18,000 13.93% Total 2016 ADP for HCEs = 13.93% / 3 = 4.64% If maximum ADP was 4.38%, HCEs ADP must be lowered by 0.26% Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test Step 1: Determine amount to be refunded by reducing highest ADR to next highest ADR or by full 0.26% Current Year Compensation (2016) Maximum Deferral Limited ADRs HCE 3 95,000

4,341.50 4.57% HCE 1 150,000 6,855.00 4.57% HCE 2 150,000 6,000.00 4.00% 17,196.50

13.14% Total Maximum ADP for HCEs = 13.14% / 3 = 4.38% Dollar Amount of Correction = $18,000 - $17,196.50 = $803.50 Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test Step 2: Allocate amount determined in Step 1 among HCEs by reducing highest dollar amount of deferrals to next highest dollar amount of deferrals or by full required correction Elective Deferrals Corrective Distribution Deferrals Remaining HCE 1 7,000.00 803.50 HCE 2

6,000.00 - 6,000.00 HCE 3 5,000.00 - 5,000.00 Total 18,000.00 803.50 6,196.50

17,196.50 Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test Corrective distributions of excess contributions must be provided to affected participants within 2 months after close of plan year for which ADP test failed. If corrective distributions are made later, employer must pay 10% excise tax on total amount of excess contributions. Under no circumstances should corrective distributions be made more than 12 months after end of plan year being tested plan will be considered discriminatory and could be disqualified Actual Contribution Percentage (ACP) Test Parallel tests for matching and after-tax contributions IRC 401(m) contains tests similar to ADP test that show whether there has been discrimination in favor of HCEs in terms of employer matching contributions and employee after-tax contributions actual contributions percentage (ACP) test Qualified matching contributions (QMACs) matching contributions that are qualified by satisfying rules that normally apply to elective deferrals (i.e. 100% vested and subject to withdrawal restrictions QMACs can be tested with elective deferrals under ADP test instead of ACP test possible to avoid ACP test Calculating ACP test similar to ADP test, but using actual contribution ratios (ACR)

instead of actual deferral ratios divide sum of after-tax employee contributions and matching contributions by total compensation Eligible participants who choose not to make after-tax contributions or receive no matching have ACRs of zero when deriving averages Actual Contribution Percentage (ACP) Test Same basic test and alternative test as ADP test Either prior year or current year testing method is specified by plan If test fails, must either raise NHCE averages or distribute sufficient excess aggregate contributions to affected HCEs to lower HCE averages Can provide QNECs to NHCEs to raise NHCE averages Excess aggregate contributions are either distributed from the plan, or in the case of nonvested employer matching contributions, forfeited as necessary corrections must be done within 2 months after close of plan year tested to avoid excise tax at minimum correction must be made within 12 months after end of plan year tested Alternative to Nondiscrimination Testing Safe-harbor plan design plan avoids nondiscrimination testing (ADP/ACP testing). Employer contributions to NHCEs are either a matching contribution of 100% of each employees elective deferral up to 3% and 50% of employees

elective deferral over 3% and up to 5% of compensation (basic matching formula), or employer makes 3% nonelective contribution of 3% to all NHCEs regardless of whether the employee contributes to plan. Can use enhanced matching formula only if, at any rate of elective contributions, it provides total amount of matching contributions at least equal to basic matching formula. Requires notice to employees and 100% immediate vesting of employer contributions. Can be more expensive for a sponsoring employer than annual testing Questions? John D. Lestock, Senior Accountant Lake Washington Partners, LLC Work email: [email protected] Home email: [email protected] Work number (206)770-5682

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Introduction to Financial Management

    Introduction to Financial Management

    Bidders A, B, C, and D will get shares. 15-* Green Shoe Provision "Overallotment Option" Allows syndicate to purchase an additional 15% of the issue from the issuer Allows the issue to be oversubscribed Provides some protection for the lead...
  • Understanding Development - Nursing 311

    Understanding Development - Nursing 311

    Ahmad is in his first semester of nursing school, and is learning about Freud's developmental theories. In what order would he place the stages of psychosocial development as determined in Freud's psychoanalytical model of personality development?
  • Prezentace aplikace PowerPoint

    Prezentace aplikace PowerPoint

    MPS nebo dddffGfm fm KMH nebo KT V této skupině se hlásí průměrný směr ddd ze kterého vítr vane (ve stupních, zaokrouhlený na nejbližší desítku stupňů), průměrná rychlost větru ff a nárazy větru Gfmfm v desetiminutovém období předcházejícím bezprostředně pozorování.
  • Title


    www.gafutures.org. Your HOPE/Zell eligibility can be determined with the FAFSA application. However if you wish to be evaluated for the HOPE/Zell Scholarship . only, then you may complete a GAfutures application. Eligibility: US citizen or permanent resident alien. Legal Georgia...
  • 3D Design and Solid Modelling - City University London

    3D Design and Solid Modelling - City University London

    3D Design and Solid Modelling Week 1 City & Guilds course running for 2 terms Assessment 2 practical assignments Faces Solids 1 multiple choice 1 log book Put in a file Bring each week Each evening I will on the...
  • Global Unification - maWebCenters

    Global Unification - maWebCenters

    Summaryof Global Unification When a BDC (i.e. 001)has accumulated 1200/1200BV/IBV in Home Region, UGC-001 isdesignated to accrue the excess BV/IBV of UEU. When the combined BV/IBV has reached 5000/5000BV/IBV, the overflowed BV/IBV of UEU is transferred to UGC.
  • Minnesota State

    Minnesota State

    Purpose and use. These templates were created as a response to people who want something they can customize quickly and easily. We created one template per Perkins consortium with similar layouts to create consistency in messaging and branding when communicating...
  • PowerPoint Presentation

    PowerPoint Presentation

    The Río de las Palmas has often been associated with Álvarez de Pineda and the erroneous conclusion drawn that this was the Rio Grande. Actually, the Río de las Palmas was discovered by Garay in 1523, when he sailed for...