EER Assurance Engagements Applying ISAE 3000 (Revised) Non-authoritative Guidance Marek Grabowski, EER Task Force Chair & IAASB Member IAASB Meeting New York, USA Agenda Item 6 September 17, 2019 Agenda for Today 14:00 15:00 Consultation Paper responses and Task Force proposals 15:00 15:30 Phase 2 draft guidance to date: Chapter 3

15:30 16:00 Break 16:00 17:30 Phase 2 draft guidance to date: Chapters 4,5, 10-12, 14 Page 2 Consultation Paper (CP) Responses Generally positive support Comments related in the main to: Length and complexity Examples to cover broader range of EER

frameworks Category of Respondent Work effort for preconditions pre- and postacceptance No. Percentage Investors and Analysts 1 2%

Regulators and Oversight Authorities 2 4% National Auditing Standard Setters 8 15% Accounting Firms 8

15% Determining suitability of criteria is challenging Public Sector Organizations 1 2% Materiality process including terminology Member Bodies and Other Professional Organizations 28

54% Academics 1 2% Individuals and Others 3 6% Total

52 100% Assertions Limited vs reasonable assurance Many detailed drafting suggestions Some comments on matters related to phase 2 or not in scope Page 3 CP Responses Overarching Themes Relating to Guidance as a Whole Guidance long, complex, difficult to navigate Focus should be on EER-specific challenges, but useful to also provide educational background Sustainability reporting addressed well; value creation not sufficiently addressed

Differential requirements for limited and reasonable assurance Future-proof guidance: consider evolution in EER reporting (including technological) and implications for assurance Clarify linkages between guidance, Standard and other subject-specific standards Page 4 TF Proposals to Address Overarching Themes Relating to Guidance as a Whole Restructure guidance: Main body of guidance: practical guidance and short examples Appendix: longer/more complex examples Supplement: Background and Contextual Information Use hyperlinks between main body of guidance, Appendix and Supplement Broaden range of examples Address differential requirements for limited and reasonable assurance

Acknowledge technology and other developments, but principles remain the same Address detailed drafting suggestions in drafting combined guidance Page 5 Question 1 Themes on Scope of Guidance (paras 9-15 of CP) and TF proposals to address themes Clearly define EER engagements, intended audience and purpose Guidance would be helpful on: Using the work of others Financial information in EER reports Quality control (and compliance with ISQC 1 or similar standard) Direct engagements Task Force proposals: Identify subject matters covered under ISAE 3000 (Revised) and whether they are EER engagements Clarify focus is non-authoritative guidance for assurance practitioners on EER key challenges

Guidance on using work of others, ISQC 1, and financial information to be developed in phase 2: Direct engagements outside of project proposal, but clarify that guidance may be applied where challenges present Page 6 Comments and Questions on Structure and Scope Page 7 Question 1 Themes on Preconditions and Internal Control (paras 25 of CP) Guidance generally supported Some concerns raised about: Differentiating work effort pre- and post-acceptance, and iterative nature Apparent inconsistencies between paragraphs 45 and 60 of draft guidance Interrelationships between preconditions

Further guidance needed: On readiness assessments To recognise a substantive approach is possible On rational purpose: point in time engagements; inappropriate association of the practitioners name; direct contact with users Page 8 TF Proposals to Address Themes on Preconditions and Internal Control Guidance cannot provide a bright line on work effort pre- and post- acceptance, but can indicate factors and give examples of factors Further guidance on readiness assessments included in phase 2 material Clarify paragraphs 46 and 60 to address apparent inconsistencies Other comments to be considered during further development of phase 2 guidance Page 9

ma Question 1 Themes on Suitability and Availability of Criteria (paragraph 29 of CP) Determining suitability of criteria challenging in practice Call for examples to address non-prescriptive nature of principles-based frameworks, for example, Integrated Reporting, IASBs Management Commentary Practice Statement, UK Strategic Report Need for further guidance on: Availability of criteria, and changes in criteria Consideration of how preparer has identified user needs Clarifying apparent inconsistency between presumption that established criteria are suitable and need for entity-developed criteria when using some established frameworks Page 10

TF Proposals to Address Themes on Suitability and Availability of Criteria Further examples to illustrate thought process, including understanding user needs and changes in criteria Clarify that criteria under an EER reporting framework are unlikely to be sufficient without supplementary entity-developed criteria Clarify apparent inconsistency by explicitly stating that high-level principles-based framework is an indicator that framework may not be suitable on its own Clarify that it is a precondition for criteria to be made available Page 11 ma Question 1 Themes on Materiality Process (paragraph 33 of CP) Chapter 8 provides useful guidance on a complex area However:

Terminology is confusing Clear linkage needed between practitioners consideration of the materiality process and of preconditions The needs of intended users are crucial Guidance should not imply an obligation to review materiality process There is a need for the preparer to consider more than impact in developing criteria Clarification needed on disclosure of materiality process Guidance would be helpful on the use of multiple frameworks as sources of criteria Page 12 TF Proposals to Address Themes on Materiality Process Develop different term to describe a preparers process Further examples to show how criteria are developed and applied and link consideration of materiality process and preconditions, and to illustrate considerations where multiple frameworks are used

Clarify that preparers materiality process may be a useful source of evidence about suitability of criteria Clarify that disclosure not generally required (although some frameworks may require), but may be helpful to users Page 13 ma Question 1 Themes on Materiality of Misstatements (paragraph 35 of CP) and TF proposals to address More guidance is needed on: Qualitative materiality Disparate aspects of underlying subject matter with no common basis for aggregation The meaning of clearly trivial Consideration of materiality in planning and performing the engagement Considering the structure of the overall report and the priority with which the information is presented

One respondent noted that misstatements arising from not knowing could be material Task Force actions and proposals: Some new guidance included and currently being developed further to address comments raised (subject to TF views in paragraphs 60-62 of the Issues Paper) Not knowing is not a misstatement, but may be a reason for one occurring or not being detected Guidance on considering materiality in planning and performing the engagement allocated to phase 2 Page 14 Comments and Questions Page 15 ma

Question 1 Themes on Assertions (paragraph 40 of CP) and TF proposals to address themes Respondents generally supportive of the guidance on assertions; some concerns about: Length and complexity Usefulness to practitioners not familiar with the concept of assertions Apparent inconsistencies with ISA 315 and ISAE 3410 Whether assertions for an EER engagement should be consistent financial statement assertions The omission of valuation and completeness assertions; the need to further explain free from error and connectivity One respondent considered that introducing the concept of proper application of criteria may imply a fair presentation consideration Task Force proposals: Focus on practical use of assertions through illustrative examples Clarify that assertions are categorizations; there may be different ways of categorizing them as long as all the what can go wrongs are addressed

Remove free from error as it relates to all assertions Clarify intention is not to imply the need for fair presentation criteria Page 16 ma Question 1 Themes on Narrative and Future-Oriented Information (paragraph 41 of CP) Respondents generally supportive, but offered some suggestions for further development of guidance: Emphasize need for strong criteria, and include examples of suitable criteria and procedures to obtain appropriate evidence Should not create the expectation that all narrative and future-oriented information is capable of being assured Narrative and future-oriented information should be supported by a sufficient system of internal control A clear definition of narrative information needed so it is clear what is other information Draw out that a stable history of accurate forecasting provides a stronger evidential basis for a forecast

than where there is no such history Page 17 TF Proposals to Address Themes Narrative and Future-Oriented Information Chapters 11 and 12 include draft phase 2 guidance on: Need for preconditions to be present, including processes to prepare the subject matter information provide a reasonable basis How subjective statements may be revised What constitutes other information Further consideration has already been given to the example in paragraph 195 example and changes made Further examples to illustrate the challenges and considerations for narrative and futureoriented information Page 18

Question 2 Themes Relating to Use of Examples and Diagrams, and Terminology Examples and diagrams generally considered useful, and a call for more, and a broader range of, examples, but: Both financial and non-financial examples would be helpful Some respondents in favour of an end-to-end case study Examples should not suggest the only way to approach the requirements Examples should illustrate possible courses of action Terminology: Avoid introducing new terminology when existing terminology could be used Some terminology confusing (materiality process, elements, qualities, assertions) A glossary or definitions of new terms would be helpful Page 19

TF Proposals to Address Question 2 Themes - Diagrams, Examples and Terminology Focus on practical application through the use of more, and a broader range of, examples Specific comments on diagrams and examples to be considered further Revisit the terminology used and consider it can be simplified or clarified; consider need for including a glossary once terminology has been reconsidered Page 20 Question 3 Themes Relating to Structure Themes included: Use innovative ways to present guidance to assist in navigability Use a flowchart to help navigate, to link the stages of the engagement, and show the iterative nature of considerations Some reordering of chapters may be needed (e.g. chapter 8 earlier in the document)

The TF proposes to make the guidance more practical and user-friendly by: Separating main body practical EER-specific guidance from longer examples and background material Using a flow diagram to show each stage of the engagement Using hyperlinks and icons to improve navigation Considering the ordering of chapters once the combined phase 1 and phase 2 guidance is developed Page 21 Questions 4&5 Themes Relating to Potential Conflicts with and Matters not Addressed in the Standard and TF views Concern about suggestion of preliminary knowledge needed of an entitys internal control and implied obligation for practitioner to review the preparers materiality process (considered under Question 1) The guidance should not inadvertently suggest new requirements or best practice Clearly identify matters that are not addressed by the Standard

Consider amending the Standard for the guidance developed A number of individual comments noted further consideration to be given to these in drafting phase 2 guidance Task Force views: Chapter 1 of the guidance states that it is not intended to introduce new requirements; wording to be carefully reconsidered It would not be consistent with the guidance being non-authoritative to propose conforming amendments to the standard Page 22 Question 6 Themes and Task Force Proposals Relating to Additional Papers Most respondents: Agreed that the additional papers contained further useful information Supported publication alongside the non-authoritative guidance Provided additional suggestions for improvement

The Task Force proposes to: Move useful background material from phase 1 guidance to a Supplement, combining with the additional papers in the CP Clarify intended purpose and audience of the non-authoritative guidance, Appendix and Supplement and improve linkage Page 23 Question 7 Themes and Task Force Proposals on Other Matters Various individual stakeholder perspectives noted: Limited reference to the internal audit function Greater prescription would assist smaller entities No particular issues noted regarding developing nations Ten respondents raised some specific concerns about translation due to complexity of language and new terminology

The Task Force: Has developed some guidance on using the work of others (chapter 4); further consideration being given to examples to include the use of the work of Internal Audit and others Acknowledges the need for scalability; more prescriptive guidance is outside the remit of this project Terminology to be revisited Page 24 Comments and Questions Page 25 Phase 2 Guidance First Draft The EER Assurance House (under construction) Communicating Effectively in the

Assurance Report Evaluating Suitability of Criteria Applying Materiality Building

Assertions Maturity in Governance & Internal Control Challenges allocated to phase 1 & Addressing Narrative

and FutureOriented Information Challenges split between phase 1 and phase 2 Challenges allocated to phase 2 Determining the Scope of an EER Assurance Engagement Exercising Professional Skepticism and Professional Judgment Obtaining the Competence Necessary to Perform the Engagement Page 26 Chapter 3 paras 13-51: Determining the Scope of an EER Assurance Engagement Wide variety in scope of assurance engagements in practice

Meaning of Scope of Assurance Breadth Can be an entire report or only part(s) of an EER report Engagement acceptance linked to preconditions, especially rational purpose Cherry picking Increasing breadth rolling program Depth Level of assurance acceptably low engagement risk in circumstances of the engagement Other issues revisited Other Information work effort relating to preconditions assurance readiness engagements Page 27 Comments and Questions

Page 28 Chapter 4 paras 52-74: Applying Appropriate Skills Diversity, breadth and characteristics of subject matter Increases complexity in some engagements Drives need for wide range of skills and experience Engagement partner and engagement team competence Competence model different from financial statement audit Engagement partner high assurance competence; enough SM competence to take responsibility Competence considerations in assignment of team may be complex Assurance competence and subject matter competence Multi-disciplinary teams Skills matrix Competence cube Quality control

Page 29 Chapter 5 paras 75-92: Exercising Professional Skepticism and Professional Judgment Many aspects of EER that require PS and PJ Skills and experience needed to exercise PS and PJ Professional Skepticism Attitude of mind actions taken as a result Behaviours and skills that support exercise of PS Impediments to exercise of PS Professional Judgment Application of training, knowledge and experience decisions about courses of action PJ/PS - Practical examples and icons to flag throughout guidance

P S PJ Page 30 Comments and Questions Page 31 Chapters 10-12 paras 93-148: Obtaining Audit Evidence in Respect of Narrative and Future-Oriented Information New Chapter 10 on general aspects evidence and thought process Evidence needed and sources Design and performance of procedures

Evaluating sufficiency and appropriateness of evidence Illustrative example for thought process (quantitative information) How much evidence is enough? Limited v reasonable assurance Not discrete models Procedures for obtaining evidence essentially the same Guidance and examples to illustrate application of thought process to narrative and futureoriented information (integrated with guidance in previous Chapters 10 and 11 (now 11 and 12) Page 32 Chapter 14 paras 149-196: Communicating Effectively in the Assurance Report Convey conclusion and its basis to enhance user confidence Scope and level of assurance obtained - criteria used Complexity in underlying subject matter of some EER engagements impediments to effective communication

Short or Long form choice Flexibility in including additional information, but needs professional judgment Required summary of work performed Additional information may facilitate effective communication and help address expectation gaps Guidance and examples showing how additional information may enhance effectiveness of communication for each basic element of the assurance report Page 33 Comments and Questions Page 34 Next steps

Completion of combined phase 1 and 2 guidance To be presented to IAASB in December to seek approval of exposure draft Exposure draft planned for early 2020 Page 35 www.iaasb.org For copyright, trademark, and permissions information, please go to permissions or contact [email protected]

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Chemistry Unit 1A Review - ESUHSD

    Chemistry Unit 1A Review - ESUHSD

    Chemistry Unit 1A Review Sources and Uses of Water Cleaning Water Filters remove solid materials Charcoal removes odor Distillation removes salts/ions/charged particles Tyndall Effect Positive = see the light = particles in the path of the light Negative = don't...
  • Motion - SharpSchool

    Motion - SharpSchool

    Motion Objective 4.01 Determine the motion of an object by following and measuring its position over time. What Is Motion? Motion is an object changing its position over time. Pushing or pulling on objects make them move. We can measure...
  • S9 Construction and loci - KCPE-KCSE

    S9 Construction and loci - KCPE-KCSE

    How could we construct a right-angled triangle given the right angle, the length of the hypotenuse and the length of one other side? hypotenuse right angle side Constructing a triangle given RHS S9.2 Geometrical constructions Contents S9.3 Imagining paths and...
  • Russia, China, and the Birth of Communism

    Russia, China, and the Birth of Communism

    Absolute Rulers of Russia. Peter the Great and Russia. Romanov. dynasty begins in 1613. Romanovs strengthened government by passing a . law. code and putting down . revolts. which paved way for absolute rule of Czar . Peter. I. Peter...
  • The Periodic Law

    The Periodic Law

    History of the Periodic Table. Periodicity or the periodic law states that the physical and chemical properties of the elements are functions of their atomic numbers - when elements are arranged in order of increasing atomic number, elements with similar...
  • California Community Colleges

    California Community Colleges

    Access throughout California to courses with uniform content standards is possible through credit-bearing coursework delivered in the community colleges Supports and endorses the Curriculum Alignment Project (F 07 9.03) Has several resolutions that call on the CDE to "rely primarily"...
  • Estrutura e Síntese de Álcoois

    Estrutura e Síntese de Álcoois

    Reagente de Grignard + óxido de etileno Epóxidos são éteres muito reactivos. Produto é um álcool 1º com 2 carbonos adicionais. Limitações dos reagentes de Grignard Não pode estar presente água ou protões acidicos como O-H, N-H, S-H, or -C—C-H....
  • Acceleration of 1 MeV H- ion beams at ITER NB relevant high ...

    Acceleration of 1 MeV H- ion beams at ITER NB relevant high ...

    OPERA-3D code (Vector Fields software) ... to the experiment. Maximum heat load is expected to be 9.8 kW on GRG. Extrapolating 9.8 kW on 15 apertures in MeV accelerator to ITER (1280 apertures), total heat load is expected to be...