Names (continued) - Computer Science Department

Names (continued) - Computer Science Department

Chapter 5 Names, Bindings, and Scopes Chapter 5 Topics

Introduction Names Variables The Concept of Binding Scope Scope and Lifetime Referencing Environments Named Constants 1-2 Introduction Imperative languages are abstractions of von

Neumann architecture Memory Processor Variables are characterized by attributes To design a type, must consider scope, lifetime, type checking, initialization, and type compatibility 1-3 Names Design issues for names: Are names case sensitive?

Are special words reserved words or keywords? 1-4 Names (continued) Length If too short, they cannot be connotative Language examples: FORTRAN 95: maximum of 31 C99: no limit but only the first 63 are significant; also, external names are limited to a maximum of 31 C#, Ada, and Java: no limit, and all are significant C++: no limit, but implementers often impose one

1-5 Names (continued) Special characters PHP: all variable names must begin with dollar signs Perl: all variable names begin with special characters, which specify the variables type Ruby: variable names that begin with @ are instance variables; those that begin with @@ are class variables

1-6 Names (continued) Case sensitivity Disadvantage: readability (names that look alike are different) Names in the C-based languages are case sensitive Names in others are not Worse in C++, Java, and C# because predefined names are mixed case (e.g. IndexOutOfBoundsException) Who cares?

1-7 Names (continued) Special words An aid to readability; used to delimit or separate statement clauses A keyword is a word that is special only in certain contexts, e.g., in Fortran Real VarName (Real is a data type followed with a name, therefore Real is a keyword) Real = 3.4 (Real is a variable)

A reserved word is a special word that cannot be used as a user-defined name Potential problem with reserved words: If there are too many, many collisions occur (e.g., COBOL has 300 reserved words!) 1-8 Variables A variable is an abstraction of a memory cell Variables can be characterized as a sextuple of attributes: Name

Address Value Type Lifetime Scope Related Concepts: Aliases Binding Binding Times Declarations Scoping Rules Referencing Environments

1-9 Variables Attributes Name - not all variables have them Address - the memory address with which it is associated A variable may have different addresses at different times during execution A variable may have different addresses at different places in a program If two variable names can be used to access the same memory location, they are called aliases Aliases are created via pointers, reference variables, C and C++ unions

1-10 Variables Attributes (continued) Type - determines the range of values of variables and the set of operations that are defined for values of that type; in the case of floating point, type also determines the precision Value - the contents of the location with which the variable is associated - The l-value of a variable is its address - The r-value of a variable is its value Abstract memory cell - the physical cell or collection of cells associated with a variable

1-11 The Concept of Binding A binding is an association between an entity and an attribute, such as between a variable and its type or value, or between an operation and a symbol Binding time is the time at which a binding takes place. 1-12 Possible Binding Times

Language design time -- bind operator symbols to operations Language implementation time-- bind floating point type to a representation Compile time -- bind a variable to a type in C or Java Load time -- bind a C or C++ static variable to a memory cell) Runtime -- bind a nonstatic local variable to a memory cell 1-13 Static and Dynamic Binding

A binding is static if it first occurs before run time and remains unchanged throughout program execution. A binding is dynamic if it first occurs during execution or can change during execution of the program 1-14 Type Binding How is a type specified? When does the binding take place? If static, the type may be specified by either an

explicit or an implicit declaration 1-15 Explicit/Implicit Declaration An explicit declaration is a program statement used for declaring the types of variables An implicit declaration is a default mechanism for specifying types of variables through default conventions, rather than declaration statements Fortran, BASIC, Perl, Ruby, JavaScript, and PHP provide implicit declarations (Fortran has both explicit and implicit)

Advantage: writability (a minor convenience) Disadvantage: reliability (less trouble with Perl) 1-16 Explicit/Implicit Declaration (continued) Some languages use type inferencing to determine types of variables (context) C# - a variable can be declared with var and an initial value. The initial value sets the type Visual BASIC 9.0+, ML, Haskell, F#, and Go use type inferencing. The context of the appearance of a variable determines its type

1-17 Dynamic Type Binding Dynamic Type Binding (JavaScript, Python, Ruby, PHP, and C# (limited)) Specified through an assignment statement e.g., JavaScript list = [2, 4.33, 6, 8]; list = 17.3; Advantage: flexibility (generic program units) Disadvantages: High cost (dynamic type checking and interpretation) Type error detection by the compiler is difficult

1-18 Declaration vs Binding Important to note that Declaration type != Binding type. Explicit declarations means static binding. And static binding usually uses explicit declarations. Dynamic binding uses implicit declarations. But implicit declarations dont always imply binding. Usually dictated by the language type/class. 1-19

Binding Type Notes Statically bound languages are usually compiled. Dynamically bound languages are usually interpreted. However, either COULD be compiled or interpreted. The cost of dynamic binding in interpreted languages is accepted because it is hidden by the cost of the interpreter. And statically bound languages are syntactically easier

to convert to machine code. 1-20 Variable Attributes (continued) Storage Bindings & Lifetime Allocation - getting a cell from some pool of available cells Deallocation - putting a cell back into the pool The lifetime of a variable is the time during which it is bound to a particular memory cell Categories:

Static Stack-dynamic Explicit Heap-dynamic Implicit Heap-dynamic 1-21 Categories of Variables by Lifetimes Static--bound to memory cells before

execution begins and remains bound to the same memory cell throughout execution, e.g., C and C++ static variables in functions or used as globals Advantages: efficiency (direct addressing), history-sensitive subprogram support Disadvantage: lack of flexibility (no recursion), sub routine static vars cannot be shared 1-22 Categories of Variables by Lifetimes Stack-dynamic--Storage bindings are created for variables when their declaration statements are elaborated.

(A declaration is elaborated when the executable code associated with it is executed) If scalar, all attributes except address are statically bound local variables in C subprograms (not declared static) and Java methods Advantage: allows recursion; conserves storage Disadvantages: Overhead of allocation and deallocation Subprograms cannot be history sensitive Inefficient references (indirect addressing) Note all stack-dynamic vars are of fixed size. Variable sized records must live on the heap, a stack-dynamic variable (pointer) most often

will reference them on the heap. Location of declaration in sub routine may affect stack in some languages. 1-23 Categories of Variables by Lifetimes Explicit heap-dynamic -- Allocated and deallocated by explicit directives, specified by the programmer, which take effect during execution Referenced only through pointers or references, e.g. dynamic objects in C++ (via new and delete), all objects in Java Advantage: provides for dynamic storage management Disadvantage: inefficient and unreliable

1-24 Categories of Variables by Lifetimes Implicit heap-dynamic--Allocation and deallocation caused by assignment statements all variables in APL; all strings and arrays in Perl, JavaScript, and PHP Advantage: flexibility (generic code) Disadvantages: Inefficient, because all attributes are dynamic Loss of error detection

1-25 Lifetime Categories Notes Compiled languages typically use a combination of Static, Stackdynamic and Explicit Heap-dynamic variables. C, C++, Java, C# all support static variables and stack-dynamic vars C, C++, C# handle scalars and fixed sized objects (structs as stack-dynamic). Java handles anything but scalars on healp. C, C++ handle explicit heap-dynamic variables through pointers (explicit deallocation) C#, Java handle explicit heap-dynamic variables through references (implicit deallocation garbage collection)

C# supports C/C++ style pointers as well in unsafe code blocks. Variable Attributes: Scope The scope of a variable is the range of statements over which it is visible The local variables of a program unit are those that are declared in that unit The nonlocal variables of a program unit are those that are visible in the unit but not declared there Global variables are a special category of nonlocal variables The scope rules of a language determine how references to names are associated with variables

1-27 Static Scope Based on program text To connect a name reference to a variable, you (or the compiler) must find the declaration Search process: search declarations, first locally, then in increasingly larger enclosing scopes, until one is found for the given name Enclosing static scopes (to a specific scope) are called its static ancestors; the nearest static ancestor is called a static parent Some languages allow nested subprogram definitions, which

create nested static scopes (e.g., Ada, JavaScript, Common LISP, Scheme, Fortran 2003+, F#, and Python) 1-28 Scope (continued) Variables can be hidden from a unit by having a "closer" variable with the same name Ada allows access to these "hidden" variables E.g., 1-29

Blocks A method of creating static scopes inside program units--from ALGOL 60 Such variables are typically stack dynamic Example in C: void sub() { int count; while (...) { int count; count++; ... }

} - Note: legal in C and C++, but not in Java and C# - too error-prone 1-30 Declaration Order C99, C++, Java, and C# allow variable declarations to appear anywhere a statement can appear In C99, C++, and Java, the scope of all local variables is from the declaration to the end of the block In C#, the scope of any variable declared in a block is the whole block, regardless of the position of the

declaration in the block However, a variable still must be declared before it can be used 1-31 Declaration Order (continued) In C++, Java, and C#, variables can be declared in for statements The scope of such variables is restricted to the for construct 1-32

Global Scope C, C++, PHP, and Python support a program structure that consists of a sequence of function definitions in a file These languages allow variable declarations to appear outside function definitions C and C++have both declarations (just attributes) and definitions (attributes and storage) A declaration outside a function definition specifies that it is defined in another file 1-33

Global Scope (continued) PHP Programs are embedded in HTML markup documents, in any number of fragments, some statements and some function definitions The scope of a variable (implicitly) declared in a function is local to the function The scope of a variable implicitly declared outside functions is from the declaration to the end of the program, but skips over any intervening functions Global variables can be accessed in a function through the $GLOBALS array or by declaring it global

1-34 Global Scope (continued) Python A global variable can be referenced in functions, but can be assigned in a function only if it has been declared to be global in the function 1-35 Evaluation of Static Scoping Works well in many situations Problems:

In most cases, too much access is possible As a program evolves, the initial structure is destroyed and local variables often become global; subprograms also gravitate toward become global, rather than nested 1-36 Dynamic Scope Based on calling sequences of program units, not their textual layout (temporal versus spatial) References to variables are connected to

declarations by searching back through the chain of subprogram calls that forced execution to this point 1-37 Scope Example function big() { function sub1() var x = 7; function sub2() { var y = x; }

var x = 3; } big calls sub1 sub1 calls sub2 sub2 uses x Static scoping Reference to x in sub2 is to big's x Dynamic scoping Reference to x in sub2 is to sub1's x

1-38 Scope Example Evaluation of Dynamic Scoping: Advantage: convenience Disadvantages: 1. While a subprogram is executing, its variables are visible to all subprograms it calls 2. Impossible to statically type check 3. Poor readability- it is not possible to statically determine the type of a variable 1-39

Scope and Lifetime Scope and lifetime are sometimes closely related, but are different concepts Consider a static variable in a C or C++ function 1-40 Named Constants A named constant is a variable that is bound to a value only when it is bound to storage Advantages: readability and modifiability

Used to parameterize programs The binding of values to named constants can be either static (called manifest constants) or dynamic Languages: Ada, C++, and Java: expressions of any kind, dynamically bound C# has two kinds, readonly and const - the values of const named constants are bound at compile time - The values of readonly named constants are dynamically bound 1-41

Summary Case sensitivity and the relationship of names to special words represent design issues of names Variables are characterized by the sextuples: name, address, value, type, lifetime, scope Binding is the association of attributes with program entities Scalar variables are categorized as: static, stack dynamic, explicit heap dynamic, implicit heap dynamic Strong typing means detecting all type errors 1-42

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • On Relevance of Wire Load Models - University of California ...

    On Relevance of Wire Load Models - University of California ...

    Outline Motivation Performance driven bipartition problem New bipartitioning algorithm Experimental results Conclusion and future work Partitioning and Performance Previous Work (I) [Cong et al. ISPD-2002] Global clustering based algorithm with retiming Previous Work (II) [Ababei et al. ICCAD-2002] Reweighting based...


    Let families know that this is a presentation timely for seniors in high school and their families, but juniors and sophomores can benefit from learning what's ahead ... William, Hyun a-Song, Ilsung Nam. Pioneering CSA research. ... Reid Middle School....
  • The Safety and Efficacy of Namodenoson in the

    The Safety and Efficacy of Namodenoson in the

    Background (cont.) Namodenoson (CF102), is an A 3. AR agonist, currently in clinical development as a treatment for patients with advanced HCC and CPB cirrhosis. The drug target, A 3. AR, is a Gi protein-associated cell surface receptor. A 3....
  • Automatic Rule Selection with EZ Rules 3

    Automatic Rule Selection with EZ Rules 3

    Coordinator James Westgard, United States. PARTICIPANTS. Laura Mercapide, Argentina. Amadeo Saez, Brasil Aída Porras, Colombia. Oscar Martínez, Colombia
  • Members Forum - Pitchero

    Members Forum - Pitchero

    It is expected and envisaged that Sussex Cricket will come to Oxfordshire in general rather than talented players from Oxfordshire Cricket visit Hove, other than where opportunities for intensive periods of exposure to the Sussex Cricket system are possible during...
  • Overview - National Electrical Contractors Association

    Overview - National Electrical Contractors Association

    as compared with a typical DC plan. ... Provisions For Deeply Troubled Plans. Current Rules. For the minority of plans (6 - 10% or approximately 90 - 150 plans) facing . inevitable insolvency there is no early intervention option.
  • 5G as a Social Infrastructure Chaesub LEE, Director,

    5G as a Social Infrastructure Chaesub LEE, Director,

    Connecting the Objects. Seamless Life. Society Developments & ICTs (2) Mass Connectivity. Micro Connectivity. Seamless Connectivity. Reliable Connectivity. Integrated Network. Hyper-Connected Network. Smart Trustworthy Network. Key Features of 5G. Service Features.
  • Chapter 1 The Nature of Strategic Management

    Chapter 1 The Nature of Strategic Management

    Arial Garamond Wingdings Times New Roman Verdana Edge 1_Pearson_orange 1_Edge Pearson_orange Pearson_Presentation Pearson_Divider Pearson_Key Point Pearson_Thank you 2_Edge 1_Pearson_Presentation 1_Pearson_Divider 1_Pearson_Key Point 1_Pearson_Thank you 3_Edge 2_Pearson_orange 3_Pearson_orange 4_Pearson_orange 5_Pearson_orange 4_Edge 6_Pearson ...