Metaethics: an overview Michael Lacewing [email protected] .uk Michael Lacewing Cognitivism There is moral knowledge. Moral judgments are expressions of belief, and can be true or false. Moral realism: there are moral
properties, and moral judgments can fit the facts. But what kinds of truth are moral truths, and how do we discover them? Naturalistic fallacy G E Moores naturalistic fallacy: moral properties are not natural properties, e.g. goodness is not happiness. Open question argument: Is happiness goodness? is open; Is happiness happiness? is not. Goodness is a distinct
property. Objection: This only shows that the concept goodness is not the concept happiness. Cp. Is water H2O (in liquid form)? is open: Is water water? is not. Two concepts can both refer to one property. Is-ought gap Moore: you cannot deduce a moral value from a natural fact. Hume: a gap between describing and
prescribing this oughtexpresses some new relation [of which it] seems altogether inconceivable, how this new relation can be a deduction from others, which are entirely different from it Fact-value distinction According to Moore, there are facts about moral values. But what kinds of facts can these be? Arent values dependent on valuing?
A J Ayer: when two people disagree over a fact, the matter can be resolved (or at least, we know what would resolve it); when two people disagree over a value judgment, either they disagree over a (natural) fact, or there is no further way to resolve the disagreement. Cognitivism developed But moral reasoning is not silly. Natural facts can be reasons for us to act. Reasons are relational properties. Reasons are readily understandable, e.g.
reasons for holding scientific beliefs. Facts about reasons are normative facts. Cognitivism: There are facts about whether some natural fact is a moral reason. Moral reasoning The judgment X is wrong = The moral reasons against doing X outweigh any reasons for doing X. It is difficult to establish whether some fact
is a moral reason, and how strong it is. When two people disagree morally, they either disagree about natural facts or about normative facts. At least one is making a mistake. Moral reasoning Moral reasoning is a matter of weighing up what reasons we have to act in particular ways. Moral judgments cant be deduced from natural facts, but they can be
rationally supported by them. Reasons bridge the is-ought gap. Non-cognitivist response Blackburn: our judgments about what reasons we have are a reflection of our attitudes, not a description of independent normative facts. Blackburn and Williams: what is it to judge moral reasons correctly? Has someone who judges they have no
reason to be moral made a mistake? But then, how is moral reasoning possible? Non-cognitivism developed Charles Stevenson and Simon Blackburn: there is a disagreement in attitude, and attitudes are not held one-by-one. My attitude of disapproval relates to beliefs about the action (my reasons for disapproving), desires towards it, and to other attitudes of approval and
disapproval (similar feelings about similar actions). Many attitudes can be involved in a single practical ethical issue, e.g. abortion. Blackburn: very few systems of moral attitudes are internally coherent and psychologically possible. Humes analogy All human beings have sympathy. But agreement truth. when you pronounce any action or
character to be vicious, you mean nothing, but that you have a feeling of blame from the contemplation of it. Vice and virtue, therefore, may be compard to sounds, colours, heat and cold, which are not qualities in objects, but perceptions in the mind McDowells response There are truths about secondary qualities The colour of an object is the colour it appears
to normal perceivers in normal light. This is no less objective than its size or shape. Values are similarly objective what is of value merits being valued. It provides an objective reason for us to respond in a particular way. Relativism But there is no universal human set of response. Moral values are relative to cultures.
Descriptive v. normative? Is there any objective standard independent of what a culture says is right or wrong? Disagreement is not enough for relativism some cultures may be wrong. Objections Cultures share many basic values, which stem from human nature. Differences reflect different conditions of life.
Aristotles list of virtues: attempts to deal with common problems Response: there is no one best way of living Objections Relativism undermines the authority of morality. Why obey what is only social convention? Tolerance has its limits.
Relativism does not entail tolerance. If there are no universal moral values, how can we say an intolerant culture is morally wrong?
But fertility also began to show decline, especially after 1970. The demographic transition has been in progress.. The Total Fertility Rate (the average number of births a woman would have in life time if she survives through the childbearing ages)...
a. Explain the importance of key issues and events that led to the Civil War; include slavery, states' rights, nullification, Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850 and the Georgia Platform, Kansas-Nebraska Act, Dred Scott case, election of 1860, the debate over...
Tell whether the function shows growth or decay. Then graph. Example 1A: Graphing Exponential Functions. Step 1 Find the value of the base. A function of the form f(x) = abx, with a > 0 and b> 1, is an...
A unit test is an automated piece of code that invokes the method or class being tested. and then checks some assumptions about the logical behavior of that method or class. A unit test is almost always written using a...
When the CO2 level drops, the rate of respiration will also decrease in order to maintain the proper balance. Everyone should understand that one deep breath of 100% N2 will be fatal. 100% N2 will displace CO2 and O2 completely....
research firms, private equity & hedge funds … exclusive modeling & valuation weekend training seminar! INVESTMENT BANKING & CAREER DEVELOPMENT. ... Ford, GM, GE, General Mills, Dow Corning. Board of Directors. Chairman of the Board and CEO.
Langridge v Levy Winterbottom v Wright * * Assignment for Next Class Review any questions from today's assignment that we don't discuss in class Read "Common Law II" packet Questions to think about / Short papers Everyone should be prepared...
Atmospheric Water - Weather Ocean and Freshwater Distribution Three States of Water Relative Humidity Buoyancy Adiabatic Processes Cloud Types and Identification Cumulonimbus Development Air Masses Lake Effect Snowbelts Atmospheric Lifting Mechanisms Convectional Lifting Orographic Lifting Frontal Lifting Cold fronts Warm...
Ready to download the document? Go ahead and hit continue!